Organic farms more profitable

Veena Annadana

Well-Known Member
Organic farms more profitable
published yesterday Nov 14 11:04 AM


While profits are higher for organic produce, operating costs are also higher.
Image: YLE Anna Huittinen
Organic farms are more profitable than traditional forms of basic agricultural production, according to the farming sector newspaper Maaseudun Tulevaisuus. It reported on Monday that organic produce farms average profits 70% above more traditional competitors.
The findings are taken from a survey of the business accounts of more than a hundred organic produce operations by MTT Agrifood Research Finland. It found that the average profit, after salaries and investments was 31,000 euros.
Despite higher returns, the organic farming sector has been in the red for more than a decade because of higher operating costs. This year, costs for running an organic farm are expected to average 107,000 euros, still 15% higher than the costs for traditional farming.
YLE

Source: Organic farms more profitable | News | YLE Uutiset | yle.fi
 

Is organic food for the elite? I don't think so.

Is organic food for the elite? I don't think so.
Organic food consumption is on the rise despite hard times for many. I share why and how we buy organic food while on a strict budget.
By Kimi HarrisMon, Nov 14 2011 at 11:32 AM EST 3


I am no stranger to the difficulties of buying organic and high quality food. I place a high importance on feeding my growing family — and myself — good food. However, I have a husband in college and we are attempting to get him through without going into debt. This is a challenge to say the least.

But I am all for challenges and it seems that I am not the only one taking this particular challenge of eating organic food in financially hard times. Two recently released studies show that organic food consumption is actually on the rise. The 2011 U.S. Families' Organic Attitudes and Beliefs Study found that 78 percent of U.S. families buy organic food. The organic food market is growing, despite a sluggish economy.

While we can't naively assume that eating an organic diet is in reach for everyone in the U.S., there is a growing number of people who choose to buy organic food. I can't speak for everyone, but I can speak for myself. Why does someone choose to eat an organic diet when on a strict budget, and how do you make it work?

Because I am concerned about my children.
In some ways I hate to admit this, but if I didn't have children, I might not care so much. I have a deep sense of responsibility to my children and while I don't want to be the food police, I do want to be filling their bellies with nutritious, toxin-free food as much as possible.

Because it has helped me heal and have a better life.
Eating organic, high quality food helped me recover from adrenal fatigue. I was so tired I had a hard time functioning with everyday life. While I can still get tired out, I would say I am 75 percent healed. If I can't function when eating an inferior diet, I am willing to make the necessary sacrifices to eat better.

We make it possible by switching our priorities.
My husband and I don't own a TV. We just recently bought the newest car we've ever owned; it's still 10 years old. We don't own a house, and don't plan on buying until he is finished with school. We love our children and love to buy them playthings, but we don't feel obligated to spend huge amounts on new toys and books. We use our library a lot. We have never had an expensive vacation in the seven years of our marriage. We also have spent very little on furniture. But we don't feel deprived. Sure, there are things we want to buy and places we want to go, and maybe someday we will get those things. But meanwhile, we eat well, love much and concentrate on having healthy bodies and minds so that we can enjoy what we do have.

We make it possible by cooking at home.
Let's face it; cooking at home is the best possible way to eat frugal, healthy food. So while we love to eat out, we keep it to a minimum and I cook simple, frugal-but-healthy foods at home. I make my own pots of broth, soak and cook beans, stretch out my organic meats, and fill in the gaps with produce and grains. Sometimes it seems like a lot of work; other times I have such a rhythm going I don't even notice or think about it. But regardless, I have found it a beautiful thing to cook many of our meals at home to nourish my children.

Do I consider myself an elitist because I buy 95 percent organic foods? Hardly. Do I feel that I am very blessed to be able to afford what I can? Definitely. I am well aware that there is poverty and starvation around the world and I am so thankful that I can afford to fill my babies' tummies with good food. So while I don't think you need to make an extraordinary amount of money to buy organic food, sometimes it does take sacrificing other things to make it happen.

Source: Is organic food for the elite? I don't think so. | MNN - Mother Nature Network
 

What does “natural” meat really mean?

What does “natural” meat really mean?
By Harvest Public Media

November 14th, 2011

By Kathleen Masterson

Iowa – Consumers are paying more attention to where their food comes from. But the government labeling agency isn’t always keeping up. A quick stop at your grocery store reveals many meat products are labeled with the word “natural,” but consumer advocacy groups say the word is misleading. The USDA is working on clarifying the label, but it’s been stuck in debate for years now. Harvest Public Media’s Kathleen Masterson traveled to Washington D.C. and some Iowa grocery stores to get the story.

Listen Now


The word “natural” is laden with connotations. Some labels even go so far as to picture an idyllic red bar the kind that conjures up an Old MacDonald-style farm where they feed animals from a bucket. But the U.S. Department of Agriculture meaning of the “100% Natural” or “All Natural” label isn’t what most people think; according to a Food Safety and Inspections Service representative, all it means is the meat is “minimally processed with no artificial ingredients.”

Food Safety and Inspections Service is the USDA agency charged with verifying that meat labels are truthful, accurate and not misleading. But they only deal with labels about food – not animals.


The "natural" label often found on meat products, and other food items, doesn't tell the consumer much about the product. (Photo by Kathleen Masterson, Harvest Public Media)

The USDA knows this is confusing to consumers – they’ve done surveys that find most people are like those I talked to in the grocery store – they think the term refers to how the animal was raised.

But despite the confusion, the use of the word “natural” on labels has been growing.

Label expeditor Susan Glenn said nearly half the label applications she sees include the word natural.

Glenn works at Prime Label Consultants in Washington, D.C. Basically, she helps meat companies get their labels approved by the USDA. Glenn attended a meeting a few years ago with USDA, industry and consumer advocacy groups.

“Everybody had their own definition of natural,” she said. “Some were adamant and said it should be nothing in there, others disagreed.”

Not only that, but many consumers think the term “natural” is fairly similar to “organic,” said Patty Lovera of the consumer advocacy group Food and Water Watch.

“If you go look at a store that has some organic (food), they probably have some natural (food) right next to it,” she said. “That’s cheaper, and if the marketing hype works and people think that label means something, (that) they can save money and go to natural, that might cut into organic.”

Unlike natural foods, organic foods have to go through a USDA verification program and meet a series of strict rules. Organic meat generally is more expensive to raise because it comes from animals that aren’t treated with antibiotics and only eat organic, non-genetically modified food.


The certified USDA Organic label is far more informative. Producers have to go through a strict verification program before they can label their food organic. (Image courtesy USDA)

In part to address the misperception that the natural label is about how the animal is raised, the marketing branch of the USDA developed a new label called “naturally raised.”

“They got bright idea at the end Bush administration to put out kind of a super umbrella that was naturally raised,’ and when you look at what they put out – it’s not all that impressive,” Lovera said. “So it’s a collection of a couple of things, lumped together, and given the grandiose label of naturally raised.”

But you won’t see that label in your grocery story anytime soon. When the USDA’s Agriculture Marketing Service went to release the term “naturally raised” a few years ago, a flood of complaints erupted from consumer advocacy groups, including Food and Water Watch.

“So you’ve got two different wings of an agency creating chaos for consumers at the meat case who shouldn’t have to have a law degree to figure out which branch of government certified which claim,” Lovera said.

Unlike natural, which only means the meat doesn’t have any artificial ingredients added, the naturally raised label was meant to refer to livestock raised entirely without growth promotants, without antibiotics, and that have never been fed animal by-products.

Why don’t they just list the three traits on the meat label? Doesn’t naturally raised get really confusing – it’s so similar to “natural” and yet it has a totally different meaning.

“These subjective umbrella terms are really difficult,” said Craig Morris of the Ag Marketing Service. “That’s been one of the greater challenges in AMS, because in general, marketers like those umbrella terms. Because if you end up with a package of meat with 15 or 20 claims, you don’t see the meat anymore, so they like to encapsulate it in one catchy word.”

Still; USDA regulators decide to put the label “naturally raised” on hold. They’re still in the process of coming up with a more clear definition.

Until then, the term “natural” will still mostly be a buzzword for marketers that tells consumers very little about the meat behind the label. For those who want to know how their meat was raised, look for more specific terms like organic, cage-free or 100 percent grass-fed.

Source: What does “natural” meat really mean? - KVNO News - KVNO News
 

Karnataka to focus on organic farming, policy on opportunities in processing

Karnataka to focus on organic farming, policy on opportunities in processing
Tuesday, November 15, 2011 08:00 IST
Nandita Vijay, Bangalore

Karnataka department of agriculture is now gearing up to focus on organic farming and product development. The key objective of this move is to make the state, the organic hub of the country.

In this regard, the first task on hand is to come out with an organic farm policy, according to Dr G K Vasanth Kumar, additional secretary, department of agriculture, Government of Karnataka.

The state’s policy on organic farming seeks to increase rural employment opportunities, facilitate farmers’ self-help groups, reduce pollution, protect human and animal health, and help mitigate drought conditions. The state, which will host the Global Agri Business Investors’ Meet between December 1 and 2, 2011, at Bangalore, will focus on increasing the potential of organic farming.

In order to encourage organic food industry, 100 hectare have been identified in each district for transition to organic farming in the next three years, he added.

R R Hanchinal, vice-chancellor, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad, states, "Organic farming will help farmers in improving soil fertility and health of agro-ecosystem. It requires less financial inputs and can be practiced by using the available natural resources. States like Karnataka, Maharashtra, Madhya Pradesh, Gujarat, Tamil Nadu and Kerala are promoting organic farming. Karnataka and Maharashtra have already provided Rs 20 crore and Rs 10 crore budgetary allocation respectively. Uttaranchal and Mizoram have already declared themselves as fully organic farming states.”

At the BioFach 2011, which is a three-day international event being held in Bangalore, the session on policy to integrate private sector into developmental sector highlighted that though organic farming is in the introductory phase it will take another two-and-a-half decades to replace the inorganic farming.

A panel of experts comprising Mukesh Gupta of Morarka Organic Foods, which has been into organic farming for around two decades, said that it would take a while for acceptance of organic food culture. Organic has been an outcome of consumer concerns regarding the quality of food. Today the discerning consumer is demanding and willing to pay for food without contamination. Organic farming is still an unorganised sector but once major crop segments like cotton, rice, chilli and millet shift to organic farming, the state’s fortunes may change.

According to Rajashekar Reddy Seelam, managing director, Sresta Natural Bio-Products, less than one per cent of the total land area under cultivation is under organic farming.

While Santosh Kumar Phadke, coordinator of projects, International Competence Centre for Organic Agriculture, said that the growth of organic farming would depend upon the demand for organic products.

Dr K Ramakrishnappa, in-charge, Karnataka government’s organic farming cell, said that compared to normal farming practices, the yield in organic farming might initially decrease by 20 per cent, but it would equal the normal yield by the third year and soon be twice the normal.

Source: Food & Beverage News: Top News - Karnataka to focus on organic farming, policy on opportunities in processing
 

Back
Top