HOME | FREE REGISTRATION | MY ACCOUNT (For Upgrades) | DISCUSSION FORUMS | SOCIAL GROUPS | PHOTOS | BLOGS | CLASSIFIED ADS | EMAIL NEWSLETTER | ONLINE AGRI MAGAZINE | WEB DIRECTORY | ONLINE STORE



Go Back   AgricultureInformation.com > Discussion Groups > News Reports

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 04-28-2008
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 237
rgiridhar is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Organic Crops Are More Productive

Organic Crops Impressively Productive When Compared With Conventionally Grown Crops

Can organic cropping systems be as productive as conventional systems? The answer is an unqualified, “Yes” for alfalfa or wheat and a qualified “Yes most of the time” for corn and soybeans according to research reported by scientists at the University of Wisconsin-Madison and agricultural consulting firm AGSTAT in the March-April 2008 issue of Agronomy Journal.

The researchers primarily based their answer on results from the Wisconsin Integrated Cropping Systems Trials, conducted for 13 years (1990-2002) at Arlington, WI and 8 years (1990-1997) at Elkhorn, WI. These trials compared six cropping systems (three cash grain and three forage based crops) ranging from diverse, organic systems to less diverse, conventional systems.

The cash grain systems were:

1. conventional continuous corn,
2. conventional corn-soybean, and
3. organic corn-soybean-wheat where the wheat included a leguminous cover crop.

The three forage based systems were:

1. conventional corn-alfalfa-alfalfa-alfalfa,
2. organic corn-oats-alfalfa-alfalfa, and
3. rotationally grazed pasture.

In this research they found that: organic forage crops yielded as much or more dry matter as their conventional counterparts with quality sufficient to produce as much milk as the conventional systems; and organic grain crops: corn, soybean, and winter wheat produced 90% as well as their conventionally managed counterparts.

In spite of some climatic differences and a large difference in soil drainage between the two sites, the relatively small difference in the way the cropping systems performed suggested that these results are widely applicable across prairie-derived soils in the U.S. upper Midwest. The researchers also compared their results to other data analysis done on this topic in the U.S. Midwest.

Although researchers found that diverse, low-input/organic cropping systems were as productive as conventional systems most of the time, there is a need for further research, according to the study’s author Dr. Joshua L. Posner, University of Wisconsin.

“There continues to be improvements in weed control for organic systems that may close the gap in productivity of corn and soybeans in wet seasons,” Posner says. “On the other hand, technological advances may accelerate productivity gains in conventional systems that would outstrip the gains in organic systems even in favorable years.”

The true question of whether organic cropping systems are as productive as conventional systems is a dynamic question and one that requires continual reevaluation.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT +5.5. The time now is 11:45 PM.